Saxmundham: £25k benefit cheat spared jail

09:00 04 April 2012

South East Suffolk Magistrates' Court

South East Suffolk Magistrates' Court


A SUFFOLK benefit cheat who was renting out a house while still claiming more than £25,000 in handouts has been spared jail.

Nigel Ling, of Lincoln Avenue, Saxmundham, carried on making fraudulent claims even though he was the landlord of a property in Lowestoft.

The 48-year-old was given a six-month suspended prison sentence when he appeared before South East Suffolk Magistrates’ Court.

Ling had previously pleaded guilty to falsely receiving £18,907 of housing benefits, £4,991 of council tax benefits and more than £1,000 of Jobseekers’ Allowance.

After Ling’s sentencing a spokesman for Suffolk Coastal District Council said: “We took this serious case to court because Mr Ling failed to disclose ownership of a property in Lowestoft that he had bought in May 2006, as well the rental income he had received as a result from tenants, or the correct level of his earned income.

“This case was brought by Suffolk Coastal’s anti-fraud team and was the latest in the council’s on-going pursuit of anyone in the district trying to falsely claim benefits to which they are not entitled.

“It should be increasingly clear that anyone committing benefit fraud is likely to be caught, and will have to pay back whatever they have wrongfully received, appear before the courts and have a criminal record as a result.”

Following an inquiry by Suffolk Coastal District Council’s specialist benefit fraud team Ling was charged with nine counts of dishonestly claiming various benefits.

The six-month prison sentence he received has been suspended for a year.

As part of his sentence magistrates ordered Ling to be supervised by the probation service.

He was also ordered to the carry out 240 hours of unpaid community service, and to take a thinking skills course.

In addition Ling must also pay a fine of £150.


  • Should give all benefit cheats 10 years in Jail no questions asked, and yes he may have to pay the money back but it will something stupid like a pound a week.

    Report this comment

    Robert Manning

    Thursday, April 5, 2012

  • A good deterrent sentence but one thing missing- paying back the £25,000 he dishonestly claimed. I hope that civil proceedings will get the public money back- he appears to have a financial asset of a house in Lowestoft that he bought. I am not holding my breath though.

    Report this comment

    The original Victor Meldrew

    Wednesday, April 4, 2012

  • Actually for your knowledge the full amount has got to be paid back!

    Report this comment


    Wednesday, April 4, 2012

  • Should have his house taken off him or choice of a 5 year prison sentance. Tough punishment needs to be set for crimes like this

    Report this comment

    the opinion man

    Wednesday, April 4, 2012

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Other popular content

An armed police officer was called to Kesgrave as a safety precaution after a report was received of an injured dog today.


Last week’s article was about Oak Hill, the outstanding property just off Belstead Road on Oak Hill Lane, built in 1860 on a plot of land sold by Peter Burrell of Stoke Park, recaps John Norman, of the Ipswich Society.


As I recounted last week, of all the home-brew I’ve ever fooled around with, cider has been the biggest challenge, writes Martin Newell.


Plans for Sizewell C are doomed to “evaporate” in the wake of insurmountable problems that will prevent its intended forerunner at Hinkley Point ever producing electricity, one of Britain’s leading environmentalists has predicted.

Most read

Most commented

Local weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 12°C

min temp: 11°C


Show Job Lists


Newsletter Sign Up

MyDate24 MyPhotos24